TL;DR
Get backup power and energy gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
Data reported by Inion Software for April through July 2026 show a battery at a Lithuanian industrial site created an average of about €1,960 per installed MWh of capacity per month by shifting the site’s electricity use around day-ahead prices. The figure is bill savings, not measured market revenue or net profit; it excludes several costs and is based on only four months of data.
Four months of data from a Lithuanian industrial site suggest a battery controlled around day-ahead electricity prices created an average of about €1,960 per installed MWh of capacity per month from April to July 2026, according to a report by Inion Software CTO Robertas Janickas. The result is a reduction in the site’s electricity bill—not measured income from electricity trading or balancing services—and should not be read as net profit.
The example site has its own solar installation and a battery rated at approximately 1 MWh of capacity and 0.5 MW of power, equivalent to a roughly two-hour system. The site buys electricity at the Lithuanian Nord Pool day-ahead price, with a supplier margin and network charge added. It was not paid for electricity exported to the grid during the period analyzed.
Inion’s software scheduled charging when electricity was cheaper or solar generation was surplus, then discharged the battery when the site would otherwise have bought more expensive electricity. Monthly value ranged from €1,640 to €2,230 per installed MWh. About 43% of charging energy came from the solar installation and 57% from the grid; the battery completed approximately 0.8 equivalent full cycles per day.
In July, the average price during charging was €0.070 per kWh, compared with €0.145 per kWh during discharge. Across the measured batteries, discharged energy was 93% to 97% of charged energy, with those efficiency losses included in the reported results. The figures do not include battery degradation, financing, fixed network charges, or possible trading and aggregation fees.
Why Site Conditions Change Battery Value
The results show why a battery’s advertised capacity alone cannot establish what it will earn. The value in this case came from changing when the site bought electricity and using some onsite solar generation later. The economics also depended on the site’s consumption, its electricity contract, network charges, export permissions and the control strategy.
A second site in the report illustrates the difference. A similarly sized battery, used mainly to increase onsite solar consumption under a grid export constraint, created about €460 per installed MWh in July—roughly one-quarter of the first example’s monthly value. That comparison is not a like-for-like test of battery hardware: the sites had different operating conditions and uses.
For commercial and industrial owners, the distinction between bill savings and market income matters when evaluating a project. The report describes measured value behind the meter, but does not establish net returns after costs or show what the same systems would earn by providing grid services.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Four-Month Measure Covers
Janickas’s report presents the figures as results from batteries operating in Lithuania, with the clearest example covering April through July 2026. Multiplying that four-month average by 12 gives an indicative value of about €23,500 per installed MWh per year, but this is a simple extrapolation, not a measured annual result. The sample covers spring and summer, and the report does not establish that the same value would persist through other seasons.
The calculations exclude potential income from intraday trading and balancing services. Inion says its platform can exchange data for FCR, aFRR and mFRR offers, but the batteries in this dataset had not participated in those markets. The report therefore provides no measured revenue split for those services. It also says balancing offers in Lithuania start at 1 MW and increase in 1 MW increments, while commercial batteries commonly range from 0.1 MW to 0.5 MW; individual sites may need to join a larger portfolio to participate.
“Battery owners usually begin with the same question: how much can the system earn?”
— Robertas Janickas, CTO at Inion Software
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Costs and Annual Returns Remain Open
The report covers only four months, so it does not confirm a full-year result or show how the battery’s value changes across seasons. The annual figure of about €23,500 per installed MWh is an extrapolation from the April-to-July average, not a separate measurement.
It is also unclear what net returns would remain after degradation, financing, fixed network charges, and trading or aggregation fees, all of which the report excludes. The data do not measure revenue from balancing services or wholesale trading because the batteries described had not joined those markets. Results from two sites also cannot establish a typical return for all Lithuanian installations.
Operational performance is another variable. Inion reports that controller commands are normally confirmed within 0.5 to two seconds, but median battery response was 39 seconds, with the slowest 10% taking up to 11 minutes. Slow responses clustered around changes between idle and active states; one unit took as long as 15 minutes to respond to an idle command. The report says response times varied by battery model and requested transition, and that metering errors can materially alter calculated value.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Owners Need to Verify
The report points to accurate metering, a tested control connection and an electricity contract suited to the battery’s intended use as starting points for assessing a project. Owners also need to check that schedules account for site demand, solar forecasts, state of charge and operating limits, and that the battery reliably follows commands.
Before projecting value from this dataset, owners would need longer-term site measurements and a full cost calculation. Any estimate involving balancing or trading would also need to account for eligibility, aggregation and actual market participation. Inion’s report does not provide a date for additional results or a measured annual update, so whether those figures will become available remains unclear.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
How much value did the main Lithuanian battery create?
Inion Software reported an average of about €1,960 per installed MWh of capacity per month from April to July 2026. The monthly range was €1,640 to €2,230 per installed MWh.
Was that amount battery revenue or net profit?
No. It represents savings on the industrial site’s electricity bill from shifting electricity use. It is not measured income from balancing services or wholesale trading, and it excludes several costs, including degradation and financing.
Can the result be treated as annual earnings?
No. The report gives about €23,500 per installed MWh per year only as a simple extrapolation of the four-month average. It is not a measured annual result, and the data cover spring and summer.
Why did another site report a lower figure?
A second, similarly sized battery created about €460 per installed MWh in July while being used mainly to increase onsite solar consumption under an export constraint. Site conditions, export rights, tariffs and operating strategy can all affect value.
Did the batteries earn money from balancing markets?
The batteries in this dataset had not participated in FCR, aFRR or mFRR markets, according to Inion. The report provides no measured balancing-service revenue for them.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
